jet-settingchampagnedrinkingcocktailpartycommunist


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June

My Links
Captainobvious's Blog
Karenmcp's Blog
Satorisam's Blog
Scubadiva's Blog
KAZ!
Bob From Accounting!
Monkeys For Helping
Who is John Galt?
Why Not?
Dr Forbush
Pourquoi Pas?
Feisty Doll
Ya Dig?
Kurt Maddox

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Dog Etiquette and Hobby House update
08.31.04 (8:18 am)   [edit]

Well everyone it has been an interesting last couple of weeks. I traveled to Alberta for my grandparents 50th Wedding Anniversary, which I had to M.C for 200 or so friends and relatives. That was a new experience for me as most of the public speaking that I do is on a more impromptu basis and is generally an alcohol fueled diatribe on such matters of importance de jour. It all went quite well which is a step higher than I had expected. I was shooting for just not freezing up like a deer in headlights.


 


I got to spend the week with my daughter, which was nice, as I have not seen her since last January. Also, spent time with both my parents and the Ex which all went well, surprisingly. Normally, a family gathering of mine is just not the same without at least some fireworks that involve me. So, all in all, I lucked out this time and seemed to be able to dodge the usual bullets.


 


In other news Bad Boy Boo (see earlier posts on him) was introduced to dog etiquette in a rather nasty fashion over a weekend dinner. At a friend’s place He and Otis (Kerry-Blue Terrier) were introduced to my friends Husky. Unfortunately for Boo he decided that the best way to make friends with this new dog was to repeatedly lick his face. Said Husky did not take kindly to this and decided, quite appropriately, that he would teach Boo some manners. Now Otis did not take kindly to this at all. She figures is anyone is going to kick the crap out of Boo its damn well going to be her! Not some stranger dog! So she immediately attacked the Husky who was on top of Boo. Even better was the fact that I was the only one around to tear them apart at the time. So Boo got a puncture wound near his eye and perfectly shaped gashes on his nose corresponding perfectly to the Huskies bite. The husky sustained a wound from Otis on his leg and was limping around for a couple of days. Otis on the other hand walked away without a scratch. Never underestimate the attitude of a terrier.


 


Dogs never cease to amaze me. The order of dominance is Otis at 40 pounds. Husky at 65. Boo at 77 (as of that day). So the small female is at the top of the heap and going down is the two large males. Go figure! J I just can’t help but draw analogies to the human equation. I figure it pretty much works the same way with us. , At least in my own meager experience. Us simple male folk put on a pretty good show and all but (forgive me) our bark is worse than our bite, more often than not. What do you think?


 


Anyways, to update you on hobby house:


 

The monstrous server rack is still in the living room waiting to be dismantled. My front door is still partially disabled. On the plus side though all my patio stones have been dug in and set. Although the stairs are not complete they are now functional. The neighbours have probably stopped sticking pins into little dolls of my countenance as I removed the old builders stairs and old patio stones from there view. Hopefully that means a reprieve from the ritualistic drums and rituals I hear at night. The natives were restless with “Hobby House”. Now maybe that burning sensation in my back will go away. Whether it be Voodoo caused or plain over exertion hopefully there will now be peace in “them thar hills!” J          & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;   &nbs p;     & nbsp;
 
Safety First when it comes to hobby house
08.17.04 (10:42 am)   [edit]

It’s a good thing that I don't make a living doing construction because I would be broke. Last weekend I hauled a server rack home from work (hey! its the ultimate in sexy geekiness!). I can see it now some blue sex lights backlighting it in my basement! Wooo Hooo!


 


Anyways, this thing weighs a ton. Me my compadre and a dolly managed to get the thing into the front door where I have a small oriental rug on marble. Out goes the rug as this thing is leaned over to fit inside the door, with me now underneath it. Crash! Luckily though it got caught on the doorknob instead of falling on me. Unfortunately, it also cracked the doorframe. With a little jostling it can shut and lock. So my compadre and I wisely decided to ditch it in the nearest place. This is my living room as opposed to trying to go into the basement. I will have to dismantle the behemoth in order to get it into the basement. Instead we drank beer. :)  


 


Also, lately Bad Boy Boo (German Shepherd pup) decided that he was going to dig several holes to China in the front garden and had it looking like a war zone. So some neat red stones now raise and mark the garden.   


 


That leaves one entrance to my house. Sliding glass doors. Last weekend, in my ultimate wisdom decided that it would be a good idea to get rid of the "builders" patio stones, as they look crappy. They are being replaced with some cool gray slate. Of course I estimated wrong and have to return to the church of Home depot for more.


 


Even better I have decided to remove the builders stairs and replace them with the same red stones that were used in the garden.


 


So now, I have 1/2 a patio and 1/2 sandpit which is two feet underneath the sliding glass doors, no working front door and a massive server rack in my living room. Also the old stairs and stones. To top it all off, the dogs are carting in bucket loads of sand from the now open pit that had patio stones.


 


In the future I will try a little thing called “planning”.


 

Sometimes I wonder how it could be that you must destroy your abode to make it better. Sometimes I also wonder if I am a complete or merely a partial idiot! What do you think?
 
A conversation with Stepdad .. Is it just me or is He in his own little world?
08.13.04 (8:35 am)   [edit]













































Just wondering where the personal attack mentioned in your post is in the quotes?

Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

God, you have a lot of self important BS on your site.

Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: damnyankee

Well, I think being called crazy and a facist would qualify for starters, wouldn't you?


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Lol.. is this an example of how you liberal folks debate the "issues"?



Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

who says I am a liberal? It must be because I disagree with you.

Tsk. Tsk. Such dualistic reductionistic thnking will get you nowhere :)

By the Way, you undoubtedly have many "issues". I am sure you would like to discuss them as well. Still, does that make you less of a self-important blowhard?


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedTigress

LOL! I just love how they do those idiotic shoutouts! LOL!!!

Send RedTigress a private messageView RedTigress's ProfileReply to RedTigress
» irishred

First time here....looks like an in your face kind of blog....I like it!



Send irishred a private messageView irishred's ProfileReply to irishred
» deshanews

Stepdad, don't worry, I've been accused of molesting my child and beating my wife by them as well. When they have nothing left to say, they resort to that kind of stuff.

I've only been on tblog for 15 days. I'm already in the top half of the hot blogs and I am hated for that. I received a personal email the other day threatening my family if I kept blogging. Seriously!! I won't say who is it, because that person is sick. I'm deciding what to do with the threat.

This is what happens when those on the left are wrong and have no way to disprove our facts. Most of the liberals on this board, are in fact, one or two people. That is obvious.

Keep it up man, we are making a difference, slowly but surely.


Send deshanews a private messageView deshanews's ProfileReply to deshanews
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Who says your a liberal? Well, I think your postings speak for themselves. As for the rest it is really just another attempt to dismiss something you cannot argue factually.



Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» stepdad

Reply to: deshanews

Lol.. see, I thought I was the only one getting death threats. Not to worry though, were not going anywhere.

I checked our hotblog standing as well, apparently were also doing reasonably well considering that we've only been here for a couple of weeks.

I suppose the childish behavior from some of the opposition will continue, I fully expect more of the same from what reducto refers to as the "Smirking Chimp Posse".

But as you pointed out they rarely if ever post any actual commentary or original thoughts on their own boards, it's normally just the same cut and pasted nonsense repeated over and over again.

I think their goal is to bury any posts of an opposing viewpoint in so much noise that they don't get noticed quite so much. Sadly it seems they don't seem to understand that a lot of our hits are actually coming from search engines like Yahoo and MSN.

Funny thing is I don't think they realize how much they are helping us, the more the continue to use such tactics the more the damage the credibility of the views they supposedly support.

If anything I think I'd be a lot more upset about their antics if I were someone lik Dr. Forbush or perhaps Whoisjohngault, people who attempt to present the more liberal viewpoint in an intellectual fashion. The Smirking Chimp Posse does far more damage to them and their credibility of their views than it could ever possibly do to us.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» stepdad

Reply to: RedTigress

Lol.. yup.. I wonder if these folks are catching on yet that all they are really doing is damaging the credibility of their own views.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» stepdad

Reply to: irishred

Welcome irish, glad to have you aboard. We try to call them like we see them at any rate :)

Feel free to drop in any time, all viewpoints are welcome here.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deshanews

I completely agree. Those guys crack me up. You should see what I've received today regarding the blog i posted last night. Checkitout is on fire! :)

Yes, much of my traffic comes from the outside which would really tick them off.

Let me know what I can do to help you also!


Send deshanews a private messageView deshanews's ProfileReply to deshanews
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad
*sigh* you said it guy:



Name?
Send stepdad a Private Message.
» damnyankee [outside user] Thursday 08.12.04 [2:26 pm]

Just wondering where the personal attack mentioned in your post is in the quotes?


» deviant1 Thursday 08.12.04 [3:10 pm]

God, you have a lot of self important BS on your site.


» stepdad Thursday 08.12.04 [2:40 pm]

Reply to: damnyankee

Well, I think being called crazy and a facist would qualify for starters, wouldn't you?


» stepdad Thursday 08.12.04 [2:41 pm]

Reply to: deviant1

Lol.. is this an example of how you liberal folks debate the "issues"?

ADHD kicking in that you can't follow your own comments?

LMAO!


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

I'm following them fine, and as usual I'm afraid you are making almost no sense whatsoever.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad


Here I'll walk you through it nice and slow, so that you understand

you stated:

Reply to: deviant1

Lol.. is this an example of how you liberal folks debate the "issues"?

I stated:

who says I am a liberal? It must be because I disagree with you.

Tsk. Tsk. Such dualistic reductionistic thnking will get you nowhere :)

By the Way, you undoubtedly have many "issues". I am sure you would like to discuss them as well. Still, does that make you less of a self-important blowhard?

Your statement:

Reply to: deviant1

Who says your a liberal? Well, I think your postings speak for themselves. As for the rest it is really just another attempt to dismiss something you cannot argue factually.

I responded:

Reply to: deviant1

I'm following them fine, and as usual I'm afraid you are making almost no sense whatsoever.


I am afraid I can not illustrate your comments for you any clearer than that. Try to keep up :)

Incidentally, what is the argument you mention that I can not win factually.


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Most everyone one you've ever replied to actually, but in this case it is the fact that people like Usefulidiot, checkitout and yourself (just to name a few) often decry conservatives for making personal attacks and yet almost all of their own postings or comments contain such personal attacks.

As to the point you attempted to make, that my statement

"Lol.. is this an example of how you liberal folks debate the "issues"?"

It was made in response to a personal attack of your own. You will note that it is not a personal attack, merely pointing out that you were using personal attacks and not discussing the issues. You will also note it is preceded with the term LOL, as in laughing out loud. I was pointing out that I found it rather funny that you were decrying conservatives for not debating issues and yet you as a liberal never seem to debate issues.

I found it rather funny, I suppose I can see where it wouldn't be quite so amusing to yourself but then again it's rarely funny to most people when their own blatant hypocrisy is exposed.



Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

1. I am not a liberal, except perhaps in your thinking where their is only two types of people, liberal and conservative.

Thats a lot like religious terms, such ass gentile or heathen (anyone not from your little group)

2. I challenge you to find any reference anywhere where I "decry conservatives for making personal attacks"

3. The same challenge goes for where I supposedly "decry conservatives for not debating the issues"

4. Your primitive "us and them" mentality shows a truly limited and very socially conditioned conceptualizing.

In fact, your inablilty to do so ultimately condemns you to buy into the status quo propaganda that your government would have you beleive: namely that you live in a democracy.

With people like yourself that will not truly question the actions and motives of the status quo, what has been happening in our society will continue to happen. The common man will continue to get poorer, the rich man will continue to get richer, and corporations will continue to control government policy to the detriment of evrything and everyone but profit.

But hey, if labelling folks helps provide framework for your us and them blinders, all the power to you.

Good Luck.



Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

As to my exchange with Yankee, you'll notice that he asked me where in the original posting I was attacked by Usefulidiot. I pointed out to him that Usefulidiot had referred to myself and all other conservatives as crazy and fascist, and asked him if he felt that should qualify as a personal attack.

I think anyone who was honest would admit that this was indeed a personal attack on Usefulidiots part, curiously though DY has chosen not to respond at all.

You on the other hand apparently are somehow misreading this conversation and I would assume trying to make it look as if I were calling DY these names, when in fact that wasn't the case at all.

If that wasn’t your intent then I can’t imagine how you could possibly interpret anything else I’ve said in these comments as a “personal attack”. I have said you don’t debate the issues and engage in personal attacks yourself, but these are statements of fact and easily proven. Your postings speak for themselves.

But I’ve never called you or anyone else a fascist, crazy or any other derogatory terms. I’ve never accused you of child abuse or anything outlandish, and yet this is how people like UsefulIdiot and Checkitout behave on a daily basis.

Honestly that’s fine by me, their ridiculous statements and childish tactics do far more to damage your credibility than mine.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

In response to your last post:

How does what anything anyone else say damage my credibility?

Oh yes, I forgot: "us and them" right?



Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Your postings and comments pretty much speak for themselves. You obviously are a liberal, even if you choose to deny it. You can call yourself a progressive or an independent or a ballet dancer for all that it matters to me, whatever floats your boat as they say. But the truth of the matter is evident and I stand by my assesment of your views.

As to your postings, i think the ramblings you muster on an earlier posting here entitled Blind in the USA speak for themselves. Amusingly you were in the middle of trying to "prove" your point by cut and pasting a ton of sources which as it turned out didn't support your mindless, baseless allegations after all.

But since you failed to vet your sources properly rather than admitting your error or even continuing the debate you ran off and hid. But there are several statements were you challenge us to debate the issues. When we did step up and show you your glaring error you stopped debating and ran for the hills. Your sources it seemed didn't support your point of view at all. Realizing your ammunition supply turned out to be blanks, you instead waited for another opportunity to try out some snide one liners.

Again however we find your comments are all sizzle and no substance.

There is nothing "us and them" about my mentality, I disagree with many other conservatives on certain issues. Case in point Deshanews and I have a different view on abortion.

However I can discuss that with deshanews and in the end even if we can't reach a consensus we can at least agree to disagree. I can even do this to a certain extent with liberals such as Dr. Forbush or WhoisJohngault. While I may not agree with their viewpoints at least I can respect them as individuals.

You however seem incapable of having any sort of rational or adult discussion. So if I take you to task for that it I'm not taking all liberals to task for it, just you. Apparently you can't seem to understand this concept, even though supposedly you are not a liberal.

Curious indeed.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

Cal me whatever you want if it helps you makes sense of your world.

I see you couldn't find any evidence whatsover of my crying the use of personal attacks or of drcrying non discussion of issues.

Why? Because I made no such statements. Instead you continue to whine about a previous post where a challenge was issued and refused by RedneckBob.

Realising you looked like idiots you then decided to weigh in on one article attempting to save face, after refusing to commit to the challenge offered.

I feel sorry for you.

 
A couple webcam shots
08.12.04 (5:05 pm)   [edit]

A pic from my network room window:



 


The Sky Ten Miutes Later:



 


 

 
Neocons! Even more BS :)
08.06.04 (1:24 pm)   [edit]

































» stepdad

Reply to: jesusisangry

Sorry JA, neither shock nor awe. But if your going to dump a list of 20-30 sources on me I'm afraid it takes me a while to actually read through them. I wanted to be fair in my responses; I didn't want to dismiss all of those sources out of hand. So I checked them and read through what they had to say, looking for facts that might support his side of the argument.

Most of his links, as I said, were links to articles that contained more opinion than fact. About the only facts I've found thus far to support this notion that their are problems with Bush's service is the fact that documents pertaining to his service from some 30 odd years ago were not instantly available for scrutiny and took some time to locate.

Knowing the military record keeping system I don't find that to be very compelling evidence of wrongdoing. All of the records they have managed to find don't seem to indicate anything out of the ordinary. So it is really a lack of evidence, rather than actual evidence, that these charges appear to be based on.

There aren't any eyewitness's stepping forward, nor any clear evidence of wrongdoing here. Basically the standard or proof being applied here is not that those making the accusations are proving them but rather that those making the accusations expect Bush to prove his innocence.

Given that burden of proof I could just as well accuse you of being an alien from outer space and then demand that you prove that you are not. You’d have a pretty difficult time of proving it, even though it would be a bogus allegation.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad


Don't request sources and then whine that you are given too many, then dump all of them out of hand.

*sigh* whats the point ...


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

I didn't whine, merely pointing out that in order to be fair it took me some time to read through them all. I read through them, as I mentioned in the previous post. However rather than responding to the points made I see you've decided instead to simply try yet another personal attack.

Sad that your position is so without merit that these constant subject changes and personal attacks are all that you can seem to muster.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

You apparently didn't (can't?) read the replies you have been getting. Let me spell it out for you.

We READ the cited articles. We measured, we weighed, and they were found wanting. We don't have to refute them point by point here, because people can go to where you found them and read them for themselves. We are confident they will conclude same.

The "point" is that we will not allow these accusations to continue to be made without answering them, and in my view we've more than proven that you haven't a clue what the heck you're talking about.





Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» jesusisangry

Reply to: stepdad
I said I applaud your efforts as well. At the time I posted my response thats what I saw. I do admit you did good research I said I agreed with the factcheck.org statement. by redneck bob. You are right people need time to check out facts. I did not give that time need to check the sources on the reply, When i posted shock and aww. I assumed that was it, I was wrong it continued. your comeback comments is a good counter attack on devient one. i' ll just have to wait till i reply on this blog. till i think both of you are done with each other responses.


Send jesusisangry a private messageView jesusisangry's ProfileReply to jesusisangry
» RedneckBob

Reply to: jesusisangry

Jump on in. If you have a view, I'll listen. Looks like things are calming down, and I'm all for discussion.


Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Reply to: RedneckBob
"measured, weighed and found wanting."

Why not try making up your own cliches?


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

If I made it up, then it wouldn't be a cliche, now would it?

Thanks once again for your intelligent, thought provoking commentary.


Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Reply to: RedneckBob

Ok then ... lest get into it. I will be happy to debate each and every source I cited to you.

Lets get it on. Otherwise, sit down and be quiet :)


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

Reply to: RedneckBob


Most recent source to this old cliche: "A Knight's Tale"

*sigh*


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

Well, we'll see how far this goes. Pick one, and comment on it, and I'll see if it's worth responding to.



Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Either commit or don't bother ...

Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

First to last or not at all. If you can not commit to a debate on all sources. however brief, then don't ...


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

I don't have to commit to anything. I've presented my evidence. You, so far, have offered nothing more than a list (which I've read through, and have decided is worthless as proof). Other people can read it for themselves. I see no particular need to debate over it. The sources are there for people to check for themselves. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go for a while. I may be back later tonight.

If you want to talk about the articles, pick one and start the discussion. Otherwise, you're just wasting my time.


Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Pussy :)

Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

Reply to: RedneckBob


A challenge issued, and a challenge declined. You sir are a coward :)

 
Neocons! Such Good fun!
08.05.04 (2:06 pm)   [edit]



























































Name?  
Send stepdad a private message Send stepdad a Private Message.
» deviant1

hmmm maybe that should tell you something about why bruce et all are doing this.

Perhaps more and more US citizens do not condone the US sticking its nose into other soverign nations autonomy at the cost of US lives.

Bruce's song is about soldiers, not about supporting war. You don't have to hate grunts to be against war.

Regarding Kerry, perhaps if you spent three tours in Vietnam you would protest wars to.

Unless of course that would hit your almighty economic interests a little to hard.


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Wow, time for a fact check. Kerry didn't spend 3 *tours* in Vietnam, in fact he didn’t spend a single *tour* in Vietnam. In truth spent just a little over 3-4 months in Vietnam, most of which it would seem was not nearly as heroic a service as the man seems to claim if certain eyewitness accounts are to be believed.

I suggest you read a post entitled "An Objective Case for the War in Iraq", as it quite nicely explains why it would have been dangerous and foolish not to interfere with Iraq's "autonomy".

I would also note that for all of the belly-aching we currently see you folks doing over this supposed interference with Iraq not one of you has yet to mention Bosnia. Were still there, BTW, with no exit strategy whatsoever. If you want to talk quagmire and interference you should discuss Bosnia first, as there was no U.S. interest really in that conflict at all. But I guess saving people from a brutal dictator is reason enough to go to war if you have a Democrat in the White House, but not if you have a Republican in the White house.

Interesting, isn’t it, how your willing to give one person so much leeway and automatically assume the worst about another based solely on their political party of choice?


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» DrForbush

It's great to see celebraties stand up and take a stand to save our country. Hopefully it will encourage the 50% of people who don't vote to wake up and realize what George W Bush is doing to our country.

Send DrForbush a private messageView DrForbush's ProfileReply to DrForbush
» DRAMA

Just as ironic as say Regan using Born in the USA for his campaign theme song?

Send DRAMA a private messageView DRAMA's ProfileReply to DRAMA
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

uh huh. Sure it does. Seems a lot of countries with oil need "liberating".

Bosnia, give me a break. That was not a US led action. I beleive that was led by a UN task force. You know the one, that international agancy that your boy Bush just flouted in Iraq?

Here's an idea stay the hell in your own country.


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

"Bruce's song is about soldiers, not about supporting war. You don't have to hate grunts to be against war. "

Tell that to the vets that got spit on and called babykillers when they returned from Vietnam. John Kerry's -very- questionable assertions, and his actions with Vietnam Vets against the War contributed to the atmosphere that resulted in that behavior. He spent -four months twelve days- in-country, got three band-aid purple hearts, and bugged out, and then came back here and blasted his fellow soldiers as war criminals. That's why groups such as Swiftboat Vets for Truth are speaking out. Becuase they feel betrayed. And someone who supposedly felt their pain enough to write a song about their plight is now siding with their betrayor.



Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Reply to: RedneckBob

Well, at least He never went AWOl like your boy Bush :)


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: DrForbush

Or hopefully they'll wake up, realize that these self-indulgent celebs need to start living in the real world and stop buying their albums. No point in subsidizing self destructive behavior, I always say :)


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» DRAMA

Oh, Bruce is and was anti-Vietnam War so it's not really surprising that he would be supportive of Kerry.



Send DRAMA a private messageView DRAMA's ProfileReply to DRAMA
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

Hahahahaha "An OBJECTIVE case FOR the war in Iraq" :)

Thats an oxymoron on the level of "Dodge Ram" LMAO


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» RedneckBob

Reply to: deviant1

There has been no substantive proof presented that Bush was ever AWOL, contrary to your assertions. Bush has presented his military records, while Kerry continues to hide the documents related to his medals.



Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Prove it or don't post it. If you plan to submit some proof of this allegation I will allow it to remain. Otherwise it will be deleted, while opposing points of view are welcome here outlandish and unproven allegations are not.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» DRAMA

Reply to: RedneckBob
Of course the one man whose life he saved is pretty happy Kerry was there...


Send DRAMA a private messageView DRAMA's ProfileReply to DRAMA
» RedneckBob

Reply to: DRAMA

One person among the 23 still living people in the picture that Kerry keeps waving around support him. Who knows why.


Send RedneckBob a private messageView RedneckBob's ProfileReply to RedneckBob
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

"Self-indulgent celebs"? Hows that? All profits are going to oust your boy? How anti-American! Shame!


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

I still await your evidence of the AWOL charge. You haven't presented any facts to back up this allegation.

Also, if you wish to critique the objective case for a war in Iraq using such things as facts or perhaps a logic argument I look forward to it, your simple out of hand dismissal of it is utterly meaningless. It took no effort or research on your part, presents no facts or evidence to support your case. It does nothing to diminish the truth or logic of what was presented. In short, you lost this round.

If you are incapable of addressing issues on this level feel free to frequent some of the more outlandish and vehment bush hater blogs that seem to be all the rage here, but if your going to discuss issues here I expect you to actually discuss issues, not throw out snappy one liners and snide accusations with no proof.

So, did you wish to present something to support your viewpoint, or are these pithy obfuscations all you have?


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

You know what RNB. I don't particulary like Kerry and my blog has little to do with politics.

I can tell you that Bush and Republicans in general scare the hell out of me with their foriegn policy and I am not alone here as you have noticed.

I think American's deserve better pure and simple.

Regarding "Pithy Obfuscations" I note that you have very little in the way of sourcing your viewpoint. Excepting, of course " The OBJECTIVE case FOR war"


Hahahahaha

But Hey! I'm a Canadian! What do I know! :)


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

*sigh* how to you propose to have an OBJECTIVE case FOR anything?

Do you not understand the meaning of the word?


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» stepdad

Reply to: deviant1

Well, apparently you didn't read it well enough to realize that Redneck Bob and I are not the same person, and that while we both post here the fact is his comments and mine, as well as his postings and mine, are independent of one another. It's fairly obvious you didn't even bother to read my own posting and as a result it is small wonder you cannot reply intelligently to it.

I was forced to delete two of your postings for use of profanity, we don't allow that here. You are welcome to share your opinion, but in the future perhaps you should try and do so in a more adult fashion.

If you truly wish to impress others with the correctness of your views, behaving like a child is not going to accomplish your goals. If you wish to have a rational, adult discussion then by all means welcome. If all your interested in is the childish retorts you've used thus far, well don't expect that they will garner much attention from here on out.


Send stepdad a private messageView stepdad's ProfileReply to stepdad
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

Heres a few sources Bob:

Ralph Blumenthal, NY Times 7/9/04:
Pentagon Says Bush Records of Service Were Destroyed

Pete Yost, Associated Press 6/22/04:
AP sues for access to Bush Guard records
( here's a copy of the lawsuit)

Beth Lester, CBSNews.com 5/03/04:
Gaps Remain In Bush Guard Service

CNN.com Inside Politics, 4/28/04:
Defending Kerry, Senator Blasts 'Chickenhawks'

The Associated Press, 4/27/04:
Kerry Demands Bush Prove Guard Service

Morlin/Steele, Spokane Spokesman-Review 3/14/04:
Stringent military screening program may explain gaps on president's record

Mimi Swartz, New York Times 2/27/04:
In Search of the President's Missing Years

Josh Marshall, The Hill 2/26/04:
Bush Camp's Lies Keep Guard Issue in Spotlight

Yahoo/Reuters, 2/25/04:
'Doonesbury' Offers $10,000 for Proof Bush Served

Jackson Baker, Memphis Flyer 2/13/04:
Bush a No-Show at Alabama Base, Says Memphian

"FedEx Pilot Bob Mintz, backed up by a Carolina colleague, recalls no Dubya at Dannelly AFB in 1972."

Josh White, Washington Post 2/22/04:
Why Bush Stopped Flying in Guard Unclear

"...Bush opted out, skipped a required flight medical exam, and left the state."

Robinson & Latour, Boston Globe 2/12/04:
Bush's loss of flying status should have spurred probe

Dan Froomkin, Washington Post 2/12/04:
Right in the Teeth

"Dental records are typically used to identify the dead."

NY Times Editorial 2/11/04:
The President's Guard Service

"The president needs to make a fuller explanation of how he spent his last two years in the Guard."

Lois Romano, Washington Post, 2/10/2004
Defense Dept. Seeks Bush's Guard File

"...no one who served in Bush's Alabama unit at that time has come forward, despite years of publicity on the subject."

Richard Cohen, Washington Post 2/10/04:
From Guardsman . . .

"...I have just told the truth about my service. He hasn't. "

Dana Milbank, Washington Post 2/9/04:
Bush to Release Vietnam-Era Military Records

"Bush said he would 'absolutely' release records such as pay stubs that would, if found, indicate more precisely how often he reported for duty."

Boston Globe Feb. 2004 -
Articles from the Archives

Mike Allen, Washington Post 2/4/04:
Bush's military record under fire

Lois Romano, Washington Post 2/3/04:
Bush's Guard Service In Question

Robert Novak, Chicago Sun-Times 2/2/04:
"...our guy was drinking beer in Alabama..."

Max Cleland, Atlanta Journal-Constitution 9/18/03:
Mistakes of Vietnam repeated with Iraq

Christopher Brauchli, Boulder Daily Camera 5/31/03:
Bush 'flyboy' act blithely obscures truth

Paul Krugman, N.Y. Times Opinion Section, May 6, 2003: Man On Horseback (alternate link)

Cynthia Tucker, Atlanta Journal-Constitution 5/11/03:
Bush soars, but how he'll land is another story

Eric Zorn, Chicago Tribune May 6, 2003: Media AWOL in noting irony of Bush's flight

Mother Jones, May 7, 2003:
Flyboy Fallout

The Daily Howler May 5-6, 2003:
Spinning Bush at War
Part One Part Two

The Nation, 05/01/2003:
Bush's Top Gun Photo-Op

Mother Jones Magazine, Jan./Feb. 2003: We were Soldiers Once? The Bush War Record

The UK Herald, 1/26/03: Chickenhawk Bush on dodgy ground

The Chicago Sun-Times, 1/17/03: Bush the latest wartime president we can't trust

The Toronto Star, November 17, 2002: What Did Dubya do in the War, Daddy?

San Francisco Chronicle, October 8, 2002: Roast the Chickenhawks

Augusta Chronicle Opinion Section May 27, 2001: Hero of Korean War wants an investigation of Bush's military record

The New Republic, 11/13/00: Bush probably skipped the final 17 months of his National Guard commitment

Boston Globe, 11/3/00: Bush pressured on military gaps

News Conference Requesting Records: George W. Bush Military Suspension and Punishment (Senators Inouye and Kerrey)

Washington Post, 11/3/00: Bush Let Guard Down

Medal of Honor winner Sen. Bob Kerrey: "I can understand if he forgot a weekend. But 18 months?" (11/1/00)

The New Republic, 10/16/00 - "A spokesman for the Alabama National Guard estimates there were 600 to 700 members in the unit Bush was supposed to have served with in 1972. But none of these men has ever come forward to say he remembers Bush, and Bush has not named a single one of them."

The Birmingham, AL News 10/14/00 - Vets want proof of Bush service

The Boston Globe 7/28/00 - Republican ticket lets a military connection slip

The Washington Post, 6/26/00 - "I can't remember what I did..."

The Boston Globe 5/23/00 - One-year gap in Bush's National Guard duty


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

Gee, I am really hurt :(

You Neocons! Such good fun! Grow an IQ :)



Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
» deviant1

Reply to: stepdad

Intelligently meaning fundementalist blabber without sourcing at all? Gee, I hope if I ever become more "adult" like yourselves then maybe I will have to have a lobotomy and perhaps convert to some funamentalist religion :)

Otherwise, I am more than happy where I am :)

Don't bother with the sources I provided. Undoubtedly they are all "traitors" or some other such nonsense :)

Have a nice day ...


Send deviant1 a private messageView deviant1's ProfileReply to deviant1
 
Geek-A-Thon report
08.04.04 (7:08 am)   [edit]

Well All, It has been a bit since I have blogged. The geek-a-thon camping went really well. Everyone got good and liquored up, as per expectations and no one fell into the fire. The only issue was the Park Ranger types, who came around twice on the Friday night.


Apparently someone complained about the loud cursing and guitar playing: fair enough. The second time however was unwarranted as someone accidentally dropped the guitar. Of course this is all second hand information as I was already passed out happily in my tent. Which was probably a good thing as at the height of drunken revelry I have sometimes been known to tell authority types that hassle me or my compatriots (without cause) some not so subtle verbal cues that their presence is not required. I am sure that you get the picture.


They may have had it out for the group as the first time around everyone decided to chant the "Bad Boy's" theme from "Cops". Anyways, they did come by again the next night and I was conscious this time :). I simply assured them that a repeat of the previous night would not occur and whatnot. They were fine with this and it turned out great. No theme songs this time. ;)


The highlight of the weekend for me was the fact that another dog (a black lab) came with his owner. In keeping with his breed, he loved the water and taught Bad Boy Boo (check earlier posted pics if you don't know him) how to swim, and now He won't quit! Anyways, I got some good pics and will post them when I get a chance.

 
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
refresh window

Your Stats!




SEE YOUR IP ADDY
Blog HOT or NOT?